Tuesday, November 03, 2009

Wall Street Journal: U.N. Plans For World "Government" Are Scary

From the Wall Street Journal:

Has Anyone Read the Copenhagen Agreement?

U.N. plans for a new 'government' are scary.

We can only hope that world leaders will do nothing more than enjoy a pleasant bicycle ride around the charming streets of Copenhagen come December. For if they actually manage to wring out an agreement based on the current draft text of the Copenhagen climate-change treaty, the world is in for some nasty surprises. Draft text, you say? If you haven't heard about it, that's because none of our otherwise talkative political leaders have bothered to tell us what the drafters have already cobbled together for leaders to consider. And neither have the media.

Enter Lord Christopher Monckton. The former adviser to Margaret Thatcher gave an address at Bethel University in St. Paul, Minnesota, earlier this month that made quite a splash. For the first time, the public heard about the 181 pages, dated Sept. 15, that comprise the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change—a rough draft of what could be signed come December.

So far there have been more than a million hits on the YouTube post of his address. It deserves millions more because Lord Monckton warns that the aim of the Copenhagen draft treaty is to set up a transnational "government" on a scale the world has never before seen.

The "scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the Convention" that starts on page 18 contains the provision for a "government." The aim is to give a new as yet unnamed U.N. body the power to directly intervene in the financial, economic, tax and environmental affairs of all the nations that sign the Copenhagen treaty.

The reason for the power grab is clear enough: Clause after complicated clause of the draft treaty requires developed countries to pay an "adaptation debt" to developing countries to supposedly support climate change mitigation. Clause 33 on page 39 says that "by 2020 the scale of financial flows to support adaptation in developing countries must be [at least $67 billion] or [in the range of $70 billion to $140 billion per year]."

And how will developed countries be slugged to provide for this financial flow to the developing world? The draft text sets out various alternatives, including option seven on page 135, which provides for "a [global] levy of 2 per cent on international financial market [monetary] transactions to Annex I Parties." Annex 1 countries are industrialized countries, which include among others the U.S., Australia, Britain and Canada.

To be sure, countries that sign international treaties always cede powers to a U.N. body responsible for implementing treaty obligations. But the difference is that this treaty appears to have been subject to unusual attempts to conceal its convoluted contents. And apart from the difficulty of trying to decipher the U.N. verbiage, there are plenty of draft clauses described as "alternatives" and "options" that should raise the ire of free and democratic countries concerned about preserving their sovereignty.


Go read the whole thing.

Here's a portion of the Lord Monckton video (which we have featured here previously):


3 comments:

Anonymous said...

it never ceases to amaze me how much power and evil some people whish to do and exorcise over others.

freedom is never free and if we wake up and find ourselves governed by our own government in name only becuase treasonous left wing socialists decided this was the way to go, adding another layer of bureaucratic tyranny on our backs from outside our borders, well we will have no one to blame but ourselves.

Anonymous said...

on a lighter note here is a nominee for infidel babe of the week

http://media.photobucket.com/image/booty/imasoldier09/vixens826-laura-dore-sweetie.jpg?o=72

Pastorius said...

Rumcrook,
You're right that we have no one but ourselves to blame.

And, you're right that that chick is right up there for Babe of the Week.

There's someone else that MR and I have in mind though. Just have to get around to it.